Question
In which case was it held that the plaintiff should
provide an undertaking that the defendant can be compensated if the injunction suit is decided in the defendant's favor?Solution
Explanation: Relief by way of interlocutory injunction (Order 39 CPC) is granted to mitigate the risk of injustice to the plaintiff during the period before that uncertainty could be resolved.In order to protect the defendant, the court can require the plaintiff to furnish an undertaking so that the defendant can be adequately compensated if the uncertainty were resolved in his favor at the trial.Also, before granting an injunction, a court must give notice to the opposite parties unless it is satisfied that the object of granting the injunction would be defeated by the delay in giving notice.
Under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children Act, 2015, who may not be designated as a Child Welfare Officer?
Consider the following statement:
Statements (I): Ā Consideration is necessary to create an agency
Statements (II): No consideration is...
According to the IRDA Act, 1999 the Central Government shall, while appointing the Chairperson and the whole-time members, ensure that____________
Under BNSS, which of the following is NOT included in the definition of a ācomplaintā?
How can the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) be removed from office?
What is the punishment for false evidence under Companies Act 2013 ?
Execution can be carried against whom?
Under the BNSS, 2023, what is the difference between aĀ bondĀ and aĀ bail bond?
Which Section of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides for the confirmation by the High Court an order of death penalty passed by Session Court prior...
As per theBharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, what is the punishment for dishonestly or fraudulently concealing or removing property?
