Question
Mark the correct statements: 1. An agreement
without consideration is void 2. Consideration should have some value in the eyes of law 3. Consideration must be adequate 4. Invitation cannot be proved in a court of lawSolution
An agreement without consideration is void - This is a fundamental principle of contract law. Consideration is essential for a contract to be valid, and an agreement without consideration is considered to be a gift, which is not legally enforceable. Consideration should have some value in the eyes of law - Consideration must have some value, although it need not be adequate. For example, a promise to pay Rs.1,000 in exchange for a car worth Rs.50,000 would still be valid consideration, even though the consideration is not adequate. Consideration must be adequate - This statement is incorrect. Consideration need not be adequate, but it must have some value in the eyes of law. Invitation cannot be proved in a court of law - This statement is incorrect. An invitation to make an offer (also known as an invitation to treat) is an essential element of a contract. It is not an offer, but it is a preliminary step towards making an offer. An invitation to treat can be proved in a court of law. Â
What is true about the teaser loan rates charged by banks?
Which one of the following statements is true
Recently, Brenda Hale was appointed as first female president of the Supreme Court in which of the following country?Â
Which of the following is true about the discounting of bill of banks?
I. Banks provide short-term finance by discounting bills, by making paymen...
Three numbers a, b and c are co-prime to each other such that ab = 116 and bc = 203. Find the value of (a + b + c).
How much penalty is to be paid by a person having more than one Permanent Account Number (PAN card)?
IDBI Bank headquarter is atÂ
Fiscal Policy in India is formulated by whom?
Which of the following statements is true about Debt-Service Ratio?
Who is responsible for auctioning the treasury bills?Â