Question
In the case Ashby vs. White, 1703, the legal maxim
'injuria sine damno' is highlighted. What did the court decide regarding the damages in this case?Solution
The case Ashby vs. White, 1703 brings light on the legal maxim ‘injuria sine damno.’ There are also cases where a conduct is actionable even though no damage has been caused. In this leading case, the defendant, a returning officer, wrongfully refused to register a duly tendered vote of the plaintiff who was a qualified voter. The candidate for whom the vote was tendered was elected and hence no loss was suffered by the rejection of the plaintiff’s vote. The plaintiff bought an action for damages against the defendant. The court awarded him 5 Euros on the ground that the violation of the plaintiff’s legal right for which he must have a remedy and was actionable without proof of pecuniary damage.
Which is a standard security feature on the ₹500 and ₹2000 (now withdrawn) banknotes?
Which of the following statement is not correct about SIDBI?
At Your Wits’ End
What is the theme for the International Day of Democracy 2025?Â
Which of the following Statements about the DICGC is/are True?
I- Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation (DICGC) is a wholly owned...
What can be the maximum tenure of term deposits in India?
TReDS is the acronym for which of the following?
Forward Market Commission (FMC), which is now merged with SEBI, was mainly responsible to?
An offer of new securities by a listed company to it-s existing shareholders on a pro-rata basis, is called -
As per the Currency and Finance report of the RBI's, which initiative by the RBI fosters FinTech innovation?