Question
In the case Ashby vs. White, 1703, the legal maxim
'injuria sine damno' is highlighted. What did the court decide regarding the damages in this case?Solution
The case Ashby vs. White, 1703 brings light on the legal maxim ‘injuria sine damno.’ There are also cases where a conduct is actionable even though no damage has been caused. In this leading case, the defendant, a returning officer, wrongfully refused to register a duly tendered vote of the plaintiff who was a qualified voter. The candidate for whom the vote was tendered was elected and hence no loss was suffered by the rejection of the plaintiff’s vote. The plaintiff bought an action for damages against the defendant. The court awarded him 5 Euros on the ground that the violation of the plaintiff’s legal right for which he must have a remedy and was actionable without proof of pecuniary damage.
Test cross ratio for the monohybrid is
Kufri Pukhraj, Kufri Sheetman and Kufri Alankar are varieties of
Vetiver is primarily propagated through?
The type of activity of Bacillus Megaterium bioinoculant in soil is
Element mobile in plant but immobile in soil is
Which among the following crop has highest production in 2015-16?
India Meteorological Department has been using long range or seasonal forecast for the SW monsoon rainfall during June - September since
Given below are two statements, one is labelled as Assertion A and the other is labelled as Reason R
Assertion A: Sodic or alkali soils can b...
The "c" in "cGMP" stands for:
Micro irrigation _______ has emerged as a tool for effective management of resources which save water.