📢 Too many exams? Don’t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert 👉 call Now!
  • google app store apple app store
    • ✖

      Question

      In the case Ashby vs. White, 1703, the legal maxim

      'injuria sine damno' is highlighted. What did the court decide regarding the damages in this case?
      A The Court awarded substantial damages to the plaintiff Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      B No damages were awarded since the plaintiff suffered no loss Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      C The Court dismissed the case, stating that no harm was caused Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      D The Court awarded punitive damages to deter similar conduct in the future Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      E The Court awarded nominal damages, recognizing the violation of the plaintiff's legal right Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

      Solution

      The case Ashby vs. White, 1703 brings light on the legal maxim ‘injuria sine damno.’ There are also cases where a conduct is actionable even though no damage has been caused. In this leading case, the defendant, a returning officer, wrongfully refused to register a duly tendered vote of the plaintiff who was a qualified voter. The candidate for whom the vote was tendered was elected and hence no loss was suffered by the rejection of the plaintiff’s vote. The plaintiff bought an action for damages against the defendant. The court awarded him 5 Euros on the ground that the violation of the plaintiff’s legal right for which he must have a remedy and was actionable without proof of pecuniary damage.

      Practice Next
      More Administrative Interpretation and Maxims Questions

      Relevant for Exams:

      ask-question