📢 Too many exams? Don’t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert 👉 call Now!

    âš¡ Month End Offer - Flat 52% Off On All Courses! Enroll Now âš¡
    00:00:00 AM Left

    Question

    In the case Ashby vs. White, 1703, the legal maxim

    'injuria sine damno' is highlighted. What did the court decide regarding the damages in this case?
    A The Court awarded substantial damages to the plaintiff Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    B No damages were awarded since the plaintiff suffered no loss Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    C The Court dismissed the case, stating that no harm was caused Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    D The Court awarded punitive damages to deter similar conduct in the future Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    E The Court awarded nominal damages, recognizing the violation of the plaintiff's legal right Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

    Solution

    The case Ashby vs. White, 1703 brings light on the legal maxim ‘injuria sine damno.’ There are also cases where a conduct is actionable even though no damage has been caused. In this leading case, the defendant, a returning officer, wrongfully refused to register a duly tendered vote of the plaintiff who was a qualified voter. The candidate for whom the vote was tendered was elected and hence no loss was suffered by the rejection of the plaintiff’s vote. The plaintiff bought an action for damages against the defendant. The court awarded him 5 Euros on the ground that the violation of the plaintiff’s legal right for which he must have a remedy and was actionable without proof of pecuniary damage.

    Practice Next
    More Administrative Interpretation and Maxims Questions

    Relevant for Exams:

    ask-question