Question
If a person makes non-natural use of his land by
collecting there something which is likely to do mischief by escape, he will be liable if the thing so collected escapes and causes damage, which rule is discussed here?Solution
This principle has been discussed in developed in the case of Reylands Vs. Fletcher 1868. In Strict Liability, the point of contention is the ‘non-natural’ use of one’s land in using or handling an object/thing whereas in Absolute liability it can also be natural use of land.
Who has the power to make rules restricting voting rights under SCRA?
A suit filed under the provisions of the Specific Relief Act shall be disposed of by the court within a period of______________
What does a "Government company" mean as per the Companies Act?
According to the Companies Act provisions _____________means such capital as is authorised by the memorandum of a company to be the maximum amount of sh...
The designated partners are liable______.
Section 53 of the Companies Act, 2013 does not allow issue of shares at a discount. Which of the following category of shares can be issued at a discoun...
A Permanent Lok Adalat is headed by?
Which of the following best describes the meaning of ‘discharge of a contract by novation’?
The liability of independent tort feasors is
The Banking Regulations Act, 1949 was passed as which of the following Acts____________