Get Started with ixamBee
Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
This question has been made using Sections 21 and 17 of the Indian Evidence Act Section 21 - Proof of admissions against persons making them, and by or on their behalf––Admissions are relevant and may be proved as against the person who makes them, or his representative in interest; but they cannot be proved by or on behalf of the person who makes them or by his representative in interest, except in the cases mentioned Section 17 - Admission defined––An admission is a statement, oral or documentary or contained in electronic form, which suggests any inference as to any fact in issue or relevant fact, and which is made by any of the persons, and under the circumstances, hereinafter mentioned.
Statements: H # I, I @ J, J $ P
Conclusions: a) H # J b) H # P
Statements: F ≤ G < H; F ≥ I < J; I > K ≥ L
Conclusions:
I. I ≤ G
II. J ≥ L
III. I > H
Statements: 2 < 4 = 8 ≤ 6; 4 ≥ 9 = 7 ≥ 10
Conclusions: I. 6 > 10 II. 6 = 10
Statements: I = H ≥ T = W ≥ M; N < L ≤ M = G ≤ K
Conclusions:
I. I > G
II. N < T
III. H ≥ L
If “M % N # O © P @ S © T $ W” is true then which of the following is definitely not true?
(i) M # P
(ii) O © T
(iii) N #...
Statements: R ≥ J > V= A > S ≤ P > G < H
Conclusions: I. R > P II. H < J
Statement: C ≥ D > E ≥ H; I < E ≤ F < G
Conclusions: I. H > D II. G < H
...Statements: N $ J, J % O, O * P, P # X
Conclusions :
I. X % J
II. N $ P
III. J % X
IV. X % O
Statements: M > Q ≥ U = O, S = U < R ≤ T
Conclusions :I. M < R II. T > O III. Q ≥ T
