The following C++ code has a compilation error. How can you correct it to properly use the abstract base class `Printer`? #include class Printer { public:     virtual void print() = 0; }; class LaserPrinter : public Printer { public:     void print() {         std::cout << "Printing with LaserPrinter" << std::endl;     } }; int main() {     Printer* p = new LaserPrinter();     p->print();     delete p;     return 0; }

o The Printer class is correctly defined as an abstract base class because it has a pure virtual function print() (virtual void print() = 0;). o The LaserPrinter class correctly inherits from Printer and provides a concrete implementation for the print() method using override. This makes LaserPrinter a concrete (instantiable) class. o In main, Printer* p = new LaserPrinter(); demonstrates polymorphism. A pointer to the base class (Printer*) can point to an object of a derived class (LaserPrinter). This is perfectly valid and common practice in C++ for working with abstract classes. o The p->print(); call will correctly invoke LaserPrinter::print() due to virtual function dispatch. o delete p; correctly deallocates the dynamically allocated LaserPrinter object. o Therefore, the provided code is syntactically and logically correct and will compile and run without errors.