Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
The Round Robin scheduling algorithm allocates a fixed time quantum to each process. In the given example, three processes have burst times of 10, 5, and 8, respectively. With a time quantum of 2, each process is executed in turn until all are completed. The waiting times for each process are calculated as follows: • Process 1: Waiting time = Total time elapsed - Burst time = 20 - 10 = 12 • Process 2: Waiting time = 5 - 5 = 3 • Process 3: Waiting time = Total time elapsed - Burst time = 20 - 8 = 6 Thus, the output is [12, 3, 6]. Why Other Options Are Wrong: B) [14, 5, 8]: This option is incorrect as it does not accurately reflect the waiting times computed in the Round Robin scheduling. C) [10, 2, 4]: This option is incorrect because it implies significantly lower waiting times than calculated. D) [9, 1, 2]: This option is incorrect as it underestimates the waiting times based on the execution order. E) [0, 0, 0]: This option is incorrect as it assumes no waiting time at all, which is not the case.
Statements: M $ K; K & N, N % R, R @ W
Conclusions:
I. W & K
II. K & W �...
Statement: X > P ≥ W < Z ≤ T < S, P ≥ V
I. P > T
II. X > V
What should come in the place of question mark, in the given expressions to make ‘D > F’ always true?
P > D ≥ I _?_ J = F > M
Statements: N < G ≥ F > E ≥ D, D = O ≥ I > P
Conclusions:
I. D < G
II. N > I
III. P < E
Statement: Z > T ≥ K; Z ≤ S = J; I > T
Conclusion:
I. J > K
II. I > S
Statement: X = Y ≥ Z > Q; Y < V; W < Q
Conclusions: I. V > W II. Q > V
In this question, the relation between various elements is shown in the statement. After the statement, two conclusions are given, select a suitable opt...
Statement: M < N ≤ O = P, Q ≥ O ≤ R ≤ Z
Conclusion: I. Q > M II. Z > M
...In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusion (s) among given two conclusions is /are definitely true and the...