Question
Which of the following virtualization types allows
multiple operating systems to run concurrently on a single physical machine, but does not require a hypervisor?ÂSolution
Para virtualization is a virtualization technique that allows multiple operating systems to run concurrently on a single physical machine while requiring modifications to the guest operating systems. Unlike full virtualization, where the hypervisor simulates complete hardware, para virtualization provides an interface that enables the guest OS to communicate directly with the hypervisor, thus avoiding overhead from emulating hardware. This method increases performance by reducing the amount of virtualization needed for certain tasks and allows for efficient resource management. Para virtualization is particularly useful in scenarios where high performance is crucial, as it minimizes the performance impact associated with full virtualization. Why Other Options are Incorrect: A) Full virtualization: This method requires a hypervisor to simulate hardware fully, allowing unmodified guest operating systems to run, which makes it less efficient than para virtualization. C) Server-based virtualization: This is a broad category that includes various virtualization techniques, including those that require a hypervisor. D) Container-based virtualization: This type of virtualization uses containers rather than virtual machines, and while it allows multiple applications to run in isolated environments, it does not run multiple OS instances in the same way. E) Type 2 virtualization: This is a form of virtualization that runs on top of an existing operating system and requires a hypervisor, which contradicts the requirement of not needing one.
A certain Sales target was assigned to a team of men to complete in 18 days. But 8 men did not turn up for the target and the rest men complete the sale...
A can complete 25% of work in five days. And this takes four days more than B to complete the whole work. They started the work together but after X day...
'A' and 'B' together can do a piece of work in 12 days while 'B' and 'C' together can do the same work in 20 days. 'A' started the work alone and worke...
A and B together can complete a work in 10 days, B and C together in 12 days and C and A together in 15 days. In how many days can each of them complete...
Three pipes A, B and C can fill/empty a tank. A can fill it in 12 hours, B in 15 hours, and C can empty a full tank in 20 hours. All three pipes are ope...
'A' and 'B' can together complete a job in 15 days. If 'B' alone can finish 50% of the job in 20 days, how long would it take 'A' alone to complete the ...
Akhil and Nikhil together can complete a work in 10 days while Nikhil alone takes 15 days to complete 30% of the work. If the efficiency of Sachin is 25...
A, B, and C together can complete a task in 8 days. A alone can do it in 24 days, and B alone can do it in 18 days. How long will it take C alone to fin...
A is 20% more efficient than B. How much time will they working together take to complete a job which A alone could have done in 29 days?
- Alex and Ben can complete a job individually in 14 days and 21 days, respectively. If they take turns to work one day each, beginning with Alex, how long w...