Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
• Statement 1 is incorrect: - Originally, the act provided that the decision of the presiding officer is final and cannot be questioned in any court. However, in Kihoto Hollohan case, it held that the presiding officer's decision is subject to judicial review. • Statement 2 is correct: The presiding officer of a House is empowered to make rules to give effect to the provisions of the Tenth Schedule. All such rules must be placed before the House for 30 days. The House may approve or modify or disapprove them. Further, he may direct that any willful contravention by any member of such rules may be dealt with in the same manner as a breach of privilege of the House. • Statement 3 is incorrect: The Presiding officer cannot take up an anti-defection case on suomoto basis, but can take up only when he receives a complaint from a member of the House.
A complaint against an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act
The Constitution of India was for the first time amended in the year :
In which of the provisions of Evidence Act, electronic record has been made admissible as evidence?
Which of the following Article of constitution guarantees property as a constitutional right?
Which of the following statements is not correct?
Whenever the Central Government suspects that Coal can be obtained from any land, it may give notice to prospect for coal. Which of the following can b...
APEDA & MPEDA comes under the ambit of which ministry
According to which Jurist it is Law of Torts?
General Insurance business covers which type/s of business/es?
A __________ is authorized to buy, sell or deal in securities