Question
Consider the following statements regarding Contingency
Fund of India 1. Currently, the Parliament has authorized a corpus of ₹30000 crore. 2. It is to look for unforeseen expenditures. 3. It is placed at the disposal of Cabinet ministers. Which of the above statements are incorrect?Solution
Article 267 of the Constitution authorizes the existence of a Contingency Fund of India which is an imprest placed at the disposal of the President of India to facilitate meeting of urgent unforeseen expenditure by the Government pending authorization from the Parliament. Parliamentary approval for such unforeseen expenditure is obtained, ex- post-facto, and an equivalent amount is drawn from the Consolidated Fund to recoup the Contingency Fund after such ex-post-facto approval. The corpus of the Contingency Fund as authorized by Parliament presently stands at 30,000 crore.
Under the Indian Contract Act, a collateral contract that involves an illegal object but is signed voluntarily by both parties is later disputed.
Which challenge was posed by Over-the-Top (OTT) services to the traditional Indian telecom services?
Maximum number of partners allowed in a partnership firm is:
Which of the following statement is true?
Minimum number of directors required in a public company is:
The registered office clause of memorandum of association contains
An "Agreement to sell" becomes a "Sale" when:
The doctrine of 'Ultra Vires' is applicable to:
What will be the P/V ratio for the firm with the following sales and profit during last two years:
Under the Companies Act, 2013, which document defines the relationship between the company and its members?
