Question
In each of the questions, a sentence is divided into
five parts A, B, C, D and E in which two of the parts have some grammatical errors in them. You have to identify which pair among the given alternatives represents the parts that contain those errors. If none of the parts have any error, then mark option 5, i.e., ‘No error’ as your answer. Everyone are turned into a potential suspect(A)/ who used to be a danger to one’s personal reputation, (B)/ thanks to digital media, whom(C)/has created this art of suspicion(D)/ among the brand of current politicians. (E)Solution
In part A, the verb ‘ are’ is used wrongly with Everyone because Everyone is a singular noun which must take a singular verb. The phrase " whom has created " is incorrect. The relative pronoun " whom " is used for the object of a verb or preposition, while " who " is used for the subject. In this case, the subject of the verb "has created" is "digital media," which is referred to by the relative pronoun. Therefore, the correct pronoun is " which " (referring to the non-human "digital media"), not "whom." The phrase should be " which has created ."
The Headquarter of New Development Bank is located at :
According to the Occupational Safety, Health, and Working Conditions Code, 2020, who is responsible for prosecuting, conducting, or defending complaint...
Which mechanism primarily ensures administrative accountability in India?Â
What are the deductions made from the gross profits as prior charges according to Section 34 of the Code on Wages, 2019?
According to Code 35 (1) of the Occupational Safety, Health, and Working Conditions Code, 2020, what can an Inspector-cum-Facilitator do if they find a...
Out of the following thinkers who has not contributed to the development and theories of Torts?
The fee payable to the experts appointed by the Court as per section 14A of the Specific Relief Act shall _____________
Which of the following are the functions of the Authority under the Airport Authority of India Act?
Certified copy of a document is an evidence? If yes then which type of evidence?
In which circumstance can a Government security be held in the name of a public office as per the Government Securities Act?