Question
Direction: In the sentence given below, a part is
highlighted and suggestions for its correction are given below the sentence. Choose the correct option, which can improve the original sentence without changing its meaning. If the highlighted part is correct, select ‘No improvement required’ as your answer. A senior advocate appraised the Supreme Court that abdication of Article 370 has led to adverse consequences. A. apprised the Supreme Court that the abdication of Article 370 has led to B. appraised the Supreme Court that the abrogation of Article 370 has led to C. apprised the Supreme Court that the abrogation of Article 370 has led toSolution
In this sentence, the word "appraised" is not used correctly. The correct term should be "apprised," which means to inform or notify. Additionally, the term "abdication" is not the appropriate word to describe the revocation of Article 370. The correct term is "abrogation," which means to repeal or annul.
What approximate value will come in place of the question mark (?) in the following question? (Note: You are not expected to calculate the exact value.)...
If the difference between the compound interest (compounded annually) and the simple interest accrued over two years at a rate of...
Which of the following options is the closest approximate value which will come in place of question mark (?) in the following equation?
26.52 ×...
?% of (112.31 ÷ 13.97 × 90.011) = 359.98
The interest received by investing Rs. 1200 for 2 years at compound interest of 20% p.a., compounded annually, was re-invested for 3 years at simple int...
26.11% of ? – 521.02 = 648.51
Two trains, 'P' and 'Q', are moving with speeds of 16 m/s and 24 m/s, respectively. The lengths of the trains are in the ratio 3:...
44.89% of 600.25 + (29.98 × 5.67) + (√1940 – 10.29) = ?2
416.021 ÷ 3.782 + 13.012 × 24.987 =?
...
